HRONOPOULOS
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1986-10-20
No. 86-395
479 U.S. 916 Supreme Court of the United States (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Berger v. Edgewater Steel Co., 911 F.2d 911 (3d Cir. 1990)
    …allenge subsequent changes to a retirement plan. See Kuntz v. Reese, 785 F. 2d 1410 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) (plaintiffs whose vested benefits under a plan have been distributed in lump sum lack standing to bring an action under ERISA), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 916, 107 S.Ct. 318, 93 L.Ed.2d 291 (1986); Yancy v. American Petrofina, Inc., 768 F. 2d 707, 708-09 (5th Cir.1985) (per curiam) (employee lacks standing under ERISA to bring action over one year after his retirement claiming that a change in a retiremen…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw