CITICORP INDUSTRIAL CREDIT, INC.

v.

BROCK, SECRETARY OF LABOR

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (U.S. 1987)
  …of the Act as facially unconstitutional, because, in that court’s words, this type of pretrial detention violates “substantive due process.” We granted certiorari because of a conflict among the Courts of Appeals regarding the validity of the Act.1 479 U. S. 929 (1986). We hold that, as against the facial attack mounted by these respondents, the Act fully comports with constitutional requirements. We therefore reverse. [*742] r — 4 Responding to “the alarming problem of crimes committed by persons on rele…
• Burger v. Kemp, 483 U.S. 776 (U.S. 1987)
  …, 474 U. S. 806 (1985). The Court of Appeals assumed the trial court’s charge on intent unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof, but found the error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. 785 F. 2d 890 (1986) (per curiam). We granted certiorari, 479 U. S. 929 (1986), and now affirm. We first consider counsel’s alleged conflict of interest argument and then his failure to offer mitigating evidence.5 [*783] III There is certainly much substance to petitioner’s argument that the appointment of two partners…
• Tanner v. United States, 483 U.S. 107 (U.S. 1987)
  …ations which differ quantitatively but not qualitatively from those in the April motions,” id., at 256, denied petitioners’ motion for a new trial. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed. 772 F. 2d 765 (1985). We granted certiorari, 479 U. S. 929 (1986), to consider whether the District Court was required to hold an evidentiary hearing, including juror testimony, on juror alcohol and drug use during the trial, and to consider whether petitioners’ actions constituted a conspiracy to defraud t…