INVESTMENT COMPANY INSTITUTE

v.

CLARKE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Howlett v. Rose, 537 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …resented nor discussed in Elder. Elder was decided on the basis of Eleventh Amendment immunity. As our supreme court stated in Hill, relying on Ramah [*708] Navajo School Board v. Bureau of Revenue, 104 N.M. 302, 720 P. 2d 1243 (App.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 940, 107 S.Ct. 423, 93 L.Ed.2d 373 (1986), sovereign immunity and Eleventh Amendment immunity are distinct concepts. The eleventh amendment protects state government from the federal judiciary. Under the eleventh amendment, when a section 1983 action is…
• Will v. Mich. Dep't of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 (U.S. 1989)
  …1); Gumbhir v. Kansas State Bd. of Pharmacy, 231 Kan. 507, 512-513, 646 P. 2d 1078, 1084 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 1103 (1983); Rahmah Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue, 104 N. M. 302, 310, 720 P. 2d 1243, 1251 (App.), cert. denied, 479 U. S. 940 (1986). A larger number of courts have agreed with the Michigan Supreme Court that a State is not a person under § 1983. See Ruiz v. Estelle, 679 [*62] F. 2d 1115, 1137 (CA5), modified on other grounds, 688 F. 2d 266 (1982), cert. denied, 460 U. S.…
• J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (U.S. 1994)
  …ribed Batson as fashioning a rule aimed at preventing purposeful discrimination against a cognizable racial group.* As Justice O’Con-nor once recognized, Batson does not apply “[o]utside the uniquely sensitive area of race.” Brown v. North Carolina, 479 U. S. 940, 942 (1986) (opinion concurring in denial of certiorari). Under the Equal Protection Clause, these differences mean that the balance should tilt in favor of peremptory challenges when sex, not race, is the issue. Unlike the [*156] Court, I think th…

  ← 1 / 2 →