SALGADO-HERNANDEZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Taylor, 487 U.S. 326 (U.S. 1988)
  …ut prejudice was left to the guided discretion of the district court, and that neither remedy was given priority.8 See, e. g., United States v. Kramer, 827 F. 2d, at 1176; United States v. Salgado-Hernandez, 790 F. 2d 1265, 1267 (CA5), cert. denied, 479 U. S. 964 (1986); United States v. Russo, 741 F. 2d 1264, 1266-1267 (CA11 1984); United States v. Caparella, 716 F. 2d, at 980. B Consistent with the prevailing view, the Court of Appeals stated that it would review the dismissal with prejudice under an abu…
• Hubbard v. United States, 514 U.S. 695 (U.S. 1995)
  …Court. > * For false statements made to Bankruptcy Courts, see United States v. Taylor, 907 F. 2d 801 (CA8 1990) (upheld dismissal under exculpatory no doctrine); United States v. Rowland, 789 F. 2d 1169 (CA5) (affirmed conviction), cert. denied, 479 U. S. 964 (1986). For false statements made to Article III courts, see United States v. Masterpol, 940 F. 2d 760 (CA2 1991) (reversed conviction); United States v. Holmes, 840 F. 2d 246 (CA4) (affirmed conviction), cert. denied, 488 U. S. 831 (1988); United S…
• United States v. DOE, 960 F.2d 221 (1st Cir. 1992)
  …e outside of Massachusetts, indeed in Brazil, particularly since his testimony to this effect was unchallenged. See United States v. Hickey, 917 F. 2d 901, 904 (6th Cir.1990); United States v. Davis, 792 F. 2d 1299, 1304-05 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964, 107 S.Ct. 464, 93 L.Ed.2d 409 (1986). Ill The Sentence The district court sentenced Doe to fifteen years in prison, because it concluded that his earlier felon-in-possession conviction was for a “violent felony” within the terms of the mandatory…