PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
v.
YAHN & MCDONNELL, INC., ET AL.; AND UNITED RETAIL & WHOLESALE EMPLOYEES TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL NO. 115 PENSION PLAN ET AL. V. YAHN & MCDONNELL, INC., ET AL.

U.S. | 1986-12-01
Nos. 86-231; No. 86-253
Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
479 U.S. 982 Supreme Court of the United States (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656 (U.S. 1987)
    …mployees’ petition for certiorari in No. 85-1626 challenged the Court of Appeals’ choice of the § 1981 limitations period. The Unions’ petition in No. 85-2010 claimed error in finding them liable under Title VII and §1981. We granted both petitions, 479 U. S. 982 (1986). We address in Part I the limitations issue in No. 85-1626 and the Unions’ liability in Part II. I Because § 1981, like §§ 1982 and 1983, does not contain a statute of limitations, federal courts should select the most appropriate or analog…
  • Perry v. Thomas, 482 U.S. 483 (U.S. 1987)
    …ation agreement. The court concluded that Thomas had raised this argument for the first time on appeal.6 Id., at 140a, n. 1. [*489] The California Supreme Court denied appellants’ petition for review. Id., at 144a. We noted probable jurisdiction,7 479 U. S. 982 (1986), and now reverse. I — I I — I “Section 2 is a congressional declaration of a liberal federal policy favoring arbitration agreements, notwithstanding any state substantive or procedural policies to the contrary. The effect of the section is…
  • California v. Superior Court OF Cal., 482 U.S. 400 (U.S. 1987)
    …re taken from Louisiana to California.* Finally, the court found that, under Louisiana law, the lawful custodian cannot be guilty of kidnaping children in his custody. State v. Elliott, 171 La. 306, 311, 131 So. 28, 30 (1930). We granted certiorari, 479 U. S. 982 (1986), to consider whether the Extradition Clause, Art. IV, §2, cl. 2, and the Extradition Act, 18 U. S. C. § 3182, prevent the California Supreme Court from refusing to permit extradition on these grounds. HH I — I The Federal Constitution place…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw