YOUNG ET AL.

v.

BOWEN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• GAGNÉ v. Nw. Nat'l Ins. Co., 881 F.2d 309 (6th Cir. 1989)
  …45 Ohio St.2d 249, 249, 344 N.E. 2d 118, 118 (1976) (syllabus); compare Fawcett v. G.C. Murphy & Co., 46 Ohio St.2d 245, 249-50, 348 N.E. 2d 144, 148-49 (1976); Merkel v. Scovill, 787 F. 2d 174, 180 n. 3 (6th Cir.) (applying Ohio law), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 990, 107 S.Ct. 585, 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986). Ohio case precedent holds that an at will employee may be terminated at any time and for any reason. Phung v. Waste Mgmt., Inc., 23 Ohio St.3d 100, 102, 491 N.E. 2d 1114, 1116 (1986) (“Ohio has long adhered t…
• United States v. Angelica, 859 F.2d 1390 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …t is returned; 18 U.S.C. § 3579(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). “While the district court has discretion in ordering restitution, ... the award must be within the statutory framework.” United States v. Kenney, 789 F. 2d 783, 784 (9th Cir), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 990, 107 S.Ct. 586, 93 L.Ed.2d 588 (1986) (citations omitted). Because the amount of restitution ordered in this case was based neither on the value of the diamonds on the date of loss, nor on their value at the date of sentencing, the restitution order…
• United States v. Oren, 893 F.2d 1057 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …y order ... that the defendant make restitution to any victim of the offense.” 18 U.S.C. § 3579(a)(1) (1982). The district court has discretion under this scheme to make such an order. United States v. Kenney, 789 F. 2d 783 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 990, 107 S.Ct. 586, 93 L.Ed.2d 588 (1986). Its discretion, however, is not unbounded; Congress has specified that, except under circumstances irrelevant here, “the court shall not impose restitution with respect to a loss for which the victim has receiv…