MCNALLY

v.

UNITED STATES; AND GRAY V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• McNALLY v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (U.S. 1987)
  …cipated in governmental affairs and exercised significant, if not exclusive, control over awarding the workmen’s compensation insurance contract to Wombwell and the payment of monetary kickbacks to Seton.” 790 F. 2d, at 1296. We granted certiorari, 479 U. S. 1005 (1986), and now reverse. The mail fraud statute clearly protects property rights, but does not refer to the intangible right of the citizenry to good government. As first enacted in 1872, as part of a recodification of the postal laws, the statute…
• K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., 486 U.S. 281 (U.S. 1988)
  …he Integrity of American Trademarks v. United States, 252 U. S. App. D. C. 342, 790 F. 2d 903 (1986) (hereinafter COPIAT), holding that the Customs Service regulation was an unreasonable administrative interpretation of § 526. We granted certiorari, 479 U. S. 1005 (1986), to resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeals. Compare Vivitar Corp. v. United States, 761 F. 2d 1552, 1557-1560 (CA Fed. 1985), aff’g 593 F. Supp. 420 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1984), cert. denied, 474 U. S. 1055 (1986); and Olympus Corp. v. Uni…
• Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730 (U.S. 1987)
  …ssented, concluding that respondent’s right to confront the witnesses against him was not violated because respondent had the opportunity to assist counsel fully in cross-examining the two witnesses at trial. Id., at 942-944. We granted certiorari, 479 U. S. 1005 (1986), to determine whether respondent’s constitutional rights were violated by his exclusion from the competency hearing.7 [*736] HH HH A The Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause provides: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy…