NEELY

v.

UNITED STATES; AND RICHIE V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Hill v. Dekalb Reg'l Youth Detention Ctr., 40 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …e inmate’s " 'pseudofolliculitis’ or 'shaving bumps,''' even if shaving required by prison officials when physician ordered otherwise, "does not rise to the level of the cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by the Eighth Amendment”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011, 107 S.Ct. 655, 93 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986); Dickson v. Colman, 569 F. 2d 1310, 1311 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) (county inmate's high blood pressure presented " 'no true danger' or 'serious threat’ to his health,” and he also had full range of motion in his…
• Harris v. Chapman, 97 F.3d 499 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …g., Brightly v. Wainwright, 814 F. 2d 612, 613 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944, 108 S.Ct. 332, 98 L.Ed.2d 359 (1987); Maimon v. Wainwright, 792 F. 2d 133 (11th Cir.1986); Shabazz v. Barnauskas, 790 F. 2d 1536, 1540 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011, 107 S.Ct. 655, 93 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986). The RFRA, passed by Congress in late 1993, changed the standard relied on in Mar-tinelli. The RFRA provides that “[government may substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion only if it demonstrates t…
• Harris v. Garner, 190 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …plaintiffs Eighth Amendment cruel and unusual punishment claim because allegation of forced shave was de minimis, even though the shaving caused “bleeding, inflammation, irritation, ingrowing of hairs, infection, purulence and pain”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011, 107 S.Ct. 655, 93 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986). Were we to hold that this single allegation is sufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement of physical injury, we would surely sap the congressional scheme of its essential purpose and vitality. D. Becau…