PERKINS

v.

ALABAMA

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Blum v. Pension Invs. Corp., 671 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
  …brook Life Ins. Co., 904 F. 2d 236, 245 (5th Cir.1990)3; Martori Bros. Distribs. v. James-Massengale, 781 F. 2d 1349, 1356-57 (9th Cir.), amended, 791 F. 2d 799 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 949, 107 S.Ct. 435, 93 L.Ed.2d 385, and cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1018, 107 S.Ct. 670, 93 L.Ed.2d 722 (1986).4 There is no purpose in our again attempting the unobtainable formulation of a doctrine which will cover all situations. We have no doubt, however, that this case, in which the only issue is whether entities wh…
• United States v. ST. Michael's Credit Union & Janice Sacharczyk, 880 F.2d 579 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …. 2d 1468, 1470-71 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2015, 100 L.Ed.2d 602 (1988); United States v. Cure, 804 F. 2d 625, 629 (11th Cir.1986) (per curiam); United States v. Giancola, 783 F. 2d 1549, 1552-53 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1018, 107 S.Ct. 669, 93 L.Ed.2d 721 (1986). Where the same day transactions are performed at different banks, however, there is no duty to file a report. See Meros, 866 F. 2d at 1311; United States v. Denemark, 779 F. 2d 1559, 1562-64 (11th Cir.1986);…
• United States v. Wake, 948 F.2d 1422 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …Heavy Equip. Sales Corp., 801 F. 2d 70, 77 [*1434] (2d Cir.) (“[The rule of lenity] is a doctrine of last resort, to be used only after the traditional means of interpreting authoritative texts have failed to dispel any ambiguities.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1018, 107 S.Ct. 672, 93 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986). In addition, we find that the concerns underlying the rule of lenity are not implicated here. As stated in United States v. Palmer, 864 F. 2d 524 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1110, 109 S.Ct. 3166, 10…