WIMAN

v.

LOCKHART, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Farrell, 877 F.2d 870 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …dence proved the Farrells guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt; therefore, the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. United States v. Blanton, 793 F. 2d 1553, 1557 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Banks v. United States, 479 U.S. 1021, 107 S.Ct. 678, 93 L.Ed.2d 728 (1986). SEVERANCE The Farrells urge that the trial court erred in refusing to sever the government’s case against Co-defendant O’Brien. As noted, O’Brien argued that the Farrells masterminded the kidnapping scheme an…
• United States v. Algienon Tanner, 941 F.2d 574 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …when the government has obtained the presence of the prisoner for trial. See H.R.Rep. No. 1508, 93d Cong., 2d Sess., reprinted in 1974 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News 7401, 7416, 7429; United States v. Stoner, 799 F. 2d 1253, 1258 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1021, 107 S.Ct. 678, 93 L.Ed.2d 729 (1986). The procedure for bringing to trial an offender who is already in custody, serving a term of imprisonment for a different offense, is established in 18 U.S.C. § 3161(j).10 Under this section, no specific time…
• In re Grand Jury v. Gassiraro, 918 F.2d 1013 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …(8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986, 97 S.Ct. 1684, 52 L.Ed.2d 381 (1977). Others reject such a practice. See, e.g., In re Sealed Case, 794 F. 2d 749 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam) (relying on liberal standard for bail in this context), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1021, 107 S.Ct. 679, 93 L.Ed.2d 729 (1986); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 757 F. 2d at 110 n. 1 (noting that appeal was decided within thirty days of filing of appellant's brief); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 605 F. 2d 750 (5th Cir.1979) (per curiam) (e…