UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, ET AL.

v.

MISCO, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• City of ST. Louis v. Praprotnik, 485 U.S. 112 (U.S. 1988)
  …concluded that, even if there were such a policy,, the record evidence would not support a finding that respondent was in fact transferred or laid off in retaliation for the 1980 appeal from his suspension. Id., at 1181-1182. We granted certiorari, 479 U. S. 1029 (1987), and we now reverse. II We begin by addressing a threshold procedural issue. The second question presented in the petition for certiorari reads as follows: “Whether the failure of a local government to establish an appellate procedure for…
• United Paperworkers Int'l Union, Afl-Cio v. Misco, Inc., 484 U.S. 29 (U.S. 1987)
  …enforced today in light of what is now known.” Ibid. Because the Courts of Appeals are divided on the question of when courts may set aside arbitration awards as contravening public policy,7 we granted the Union’s petition for a writ of certiorari, 479 U. S. 1029 (1987), and now reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. [*36] II The Union asserts that an arbitral award may not be set aside on public policy grounds unless the award orders conduct that violates the positive law, which is not the case here…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23, AFL-CIO, 484 U.S. 112 (U.S. 1987)
  …iction and on the merits held that the complaint should not have been dismissed without an evidentiary hearing. 788 F. 2d 178 (1986). We granted the Board’s petition for a writ [*117] of certiorari to resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeals.4 479 U. S. 1029 (1987). We now reverse. * * * * * Petitioners argue that the courts of appeals have no jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to review settlement decisions of the General Counsel that do not result in Board orders and that are…