WELLS

v.

MCCOTTER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Parrish, 567 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …that after the charges were filed in this case, other persons were arrested on charges of homestead exemption violations. In addition to its narrow class argument, the state cites Taylor v. United States, 798 F. 2d 271 (7th Cir.1986) cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1056, 107 S.Ct. 933, 93 L.Ed.2d 983 (1987), for the proposition that late prosecution of others similarly situated will preclude a selective prosecution defense. In Taylor, the selective prosecution claim was considered post-trial, because the defendant…
• State v. Polanco, 658 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …es outlined in Oregon v. Elstad also apply “when the alleged ‘fruit’ of a non-coercive Miranda violation is ... an article of evidence” 470 U.S. at 308, 105 S.Ct. at 1293; see also United States v. Cherry, 794 F. 2d 201 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1056, 107 S.Ct. 932, 93 L.Ed.2d 983 (1987). Consequently, the same decisional law should be applied in determining whether the articles of bloody clothing must be suppressed. In summary, we hold that the defendant was not in custody for Miranda purposes…
• Sere v. Bd. OF Trs. OF the Univ. OF Ill., 852 F.2d 285 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …ppellant desires to litigate. In addition, the issues must be supported by appropriate judicial authority. Id.; see Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, 796 F. 2d 217, 220 (7th Cir.1986); Sanchez v. Miller, 792 F. 2d 694, 703 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1056, 107 S.Ct. 933, 93 L.Ed.2d 984 (1987). “It is not the obligation of this court to research and construct the legal arguments open to parties, especially when they are represented by counsel.” Sanchez, 792 F. 2d at 703. Id. at 408-09; see Fed.R.App.…