MEAD DATA CENTRAL, INC.

v.

WEST PUBLISHING CO.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Blystone v. Pennsylvania, 494 U.S. 299 (U.S. 1990)
  …cess. The court summarily rejected this argument, see 519 Pa., at 473, 549 A. 2d, at 92, noting that it had been expressly refuted in its decision in Commonwealth [*303] v. Peterkin, 511 Pa. 299, 326-328, 513 A. 2d 373, 387-388 (1986), cert. denied, 479 U. S. 1070 (1987). In Peterkin, the court reasoned that the statute properly accommodated the concerns of Furman v. Georgia, 408 U. S. 238 (1972), that jury discretion be channeled to avoid arbitrary and capricious capital sentencing, and Lockett v. Ohio, 43…
• United States v. Buggs, 904 F.2d 1070 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …o prove that the gun was operable. See, e.g., United States v. Rush, 840 F. 2d 580, 582 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1238, 108 S.Ct. 2908, 101 L.Ed.2d 940 (1988); 8 Parker v. United States, 801 F. 2d 1382, 1383-85 (D.C.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1070, 107 S.Ct. 964, 93 L.Ed.2d 1011 (1987); United States v. Harris, 792 F. 2d 866, 867-68 (9th Cir.1986).9 "The statute does not require that the Government prove the gun was actually capable of firing. Rather, it is enough that the gun was `designed t…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Martinez-Jimenez, 864 F.2d 664 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …er circuits, had assumed that section 2113(d) was violated only by the use of a loaded operable gun. United States v. Terry, 760 F. 2d 939, 942 (9th Cir.1985); see also Parker v. United States, 801 F. 2d 1382, 1384 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1070, 107 S.Ct. 964, 93 L.Ed.2d 1011 (1987). The McLaughlin opinion stated: Three reasons, each independently sufficient, support the conclusion that an unloaded gun is a “dangerous weapon.” First, a gun is an article that is typically and characterist…