STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. ROBERT ELWOOD YOUNG, PETITIONER,

v.

HONORABLE LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, AND EX OFFICIO WARDEN, FLORIDA STATE PRISON, RAIFORD, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Tampa-Hillsborough Cnty. Expressway Auth. v. A.G.W.S. Corp., 608 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
  …of property. See, e.g., Northcutt v. State Rd. Dep’t, 209 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) (road construction on adjacent property not a taking requiring just compensation because it involved no physical invasion of subject property), writ discharged, 219 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 1969). In considering the second category, it is obvious that subsections 337.241(2) and (3) did not take “all economically beneficial or productive use” 10 of every parcel of land subject to this reservation. Undoubtedly, many parcels inside…
• Fla. Audubon Soc'y v. Nat Ratner, 497 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …destruction or use of the property by the District. Cf. North-cutt v. State Road Department, 209 So. 2d 710, 713 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) (no action for [*676] inverse condemnation will lie absent actual destruction of property or use), cert, discharged, 219 So. 2d 687 (Fla.1969). Furthermore, the complained-of taking was caused by the presence of canals for which the District purchased easements. Because there was no substantial violation of any restrictions in the easement, there was no taking. Cf. Kendry v. Sta…
• Travis v. Dep't OF Transp., 333 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …fluous. (See Weir v. Palm Beach County, [*87] Sup.Ct.Fla.1956, 85 So. 2d 865; Poe v. State Road Department, Fla.App. 1st, 1961, 127 So. 2d 898; and Northcutt v. State Road Department, Fla.App. 3rd, 1968, 209 So. 2d 710, rehearing denied Sup.Ct.Fla., 219 So. 2d 687.) AFFIRMED. SMITH, J., and HODGES, JOHN G., Associate Judge, concur.…