HONIG, CALIFORNIA SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

v.

DOE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Burger v. Kemp, 483 U.S. 776 (U.S. 1987)
  …in litigation knows that judgment calls — particularly in a trial— cannot always be reasonable or correct. Moreover, this Court has not yet addressed the question presented in Thompson v. State, 724 P. 2d 780 (Okla. Crim. App. 1986), cert. granted, 479 U. S. 1084 (1987), whether the Eighth Amendment imposes an age limitation on the application of the death penalty. See Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U. S. 104, 110, n. 5 (1982). I also share the concern expressed by Judge Edenfield in Blake v. Zant, 513 F. Supp. 7…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Honig v. DOE, 484 U.S. 305 (U.S. 1988)
  …741 F. 2d 369, 374 (CA11 1984); S-1 v. Turlington, 635 F. 2d 342, 348, n. 9 (CA5), cert. denied, 454 U. S. 1030 (1981), and that the direct services ruling placed an intolerable burden on the State. We granted certiorari to resolve these questions, 479 U. S. 1084 (1987), and now affirm. II At the outset, we address the suggestion, raised for the first time during oral argument, that this case is moot.5 Under Article III of the Constitution this Court may only adjudicate actual, ongoing controversies. Nebra…
• United States v. Owens, 484 U.S. 554 (U.S. 1988)
  …7] Clause and Rule 802 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.1 By divided vote it upheld both challenges (though finding the Rule 802 violation harmless error), and reversed the judgment of the District Court. 789 F. 2d 750 (1986). We granted certiorari, 479 U. S. 1084 (1987), to resolve the conflict with other Circuits on the significance of a hearsay declarant’s memory loss both with respect to the Confrontation Clause, see, e. g., United States ex rel. Thomas v. Cuyler, 548 F. 2d 460, 462-463 (CA3 1977), and wi…