ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ET AL.; METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY V. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ET AL.; AND RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ET AL. V. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ET AL.

U.S. | 1987-02-23
Nos. 86-735; No. 86-736; No. 86-942
479 U.S. 1085 Supreme Court of the United States (1987) Negative Treatment
Cited by 44 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (44 total)

  • United States v. Ilario M.A. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1990)
    …site indicia of reliability exist. See, e.g., United States v. Guinan, 836 F. 2d 350, 358 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1218, 108 S.Ct. 2871, 101 L.Ed.2d 907 (1988); United States v. Marchini, 797 F. 2d 759, 764-65 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1085, 107 S.Ct. 1288, 94 L.Ed.2d 145 (1987); United States v. Walker, 696 F. 2d 277, 280-81 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891, 104 S.Ct. 234, 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); United States v: Barlow, 693 F. 2d 954, 963-65 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461…
  • Levi Strauss & Co. v. Sunrise Int'l Trading Inc., 51 F.3d 982 (11th Cir. 1995)
    …sult. We have held that the “sufficiency of notice prior to the issuance of a preliminary injunction is a matter left within the discretion of the trial court.” United States v. State of Alabama, 791 F. 2d 1450, 1458 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1085, 107 S.Ct. 1287, 94 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987). In this case, appellants’ counsel had at least a weekend to prepare their opposition to the preliminary injunction. The district court did not find that they had insufficient time to prepare a defense. We d…
  • United States v. Epifanio Sanchez-Lopez, 879 F.2d 541 (9th Cir. 1989)
    …to testify to an extrajudicial statement regarding Brijido made in a telephone conversation. We review a district court’s decision to admit evidence for abuse of discretion. United States v. Marchini, 797 F. 2d 759, 762 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1085, 107 S.Ct. 1288, 94 L.Ed.2d 145 (1987). Brijido Astorga-Ayon contends that the following underlined testimony was inadmissible hearsay: BY MR. STILES: Q Did you — do you know Brejido (sic)? A No. Q During your conversations with Antonio and other…

Previewing 3 of 44 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw