CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND ET AL.

v.

KRAFTCO, INC., DBA SEALTEST FOODS DIVISION

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Clemente Hernandez-Bermudez, 857 F.2d 50 (1st Cir. 1988)
  …hat the [jury’s] judgment was not substantially swayed by the [evidence].” Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765, 66 S.Ct. 1239, 1248, 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946); accord United States v. Mazza, 792 F. 2d 1210, 1216-17 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1086, 107 S.Ct. 1290, 94 L.Ed.2d 147 (1987); United States v. Pisari, 636 F. 2d 855, 859 (1st Cir.1981). This court has ruled that the Kotteakos “fair assurance” standard is satisfied if it is “highly probable” that the challenged action did not affect…
• Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Desiderio Cartagena and Domingo Alvarez, 882 F.2d 553 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …troduced for a proper, limited purpose and therefore cannot be considered hearsay. See Fed.R.Evid. 801(c); Boston Athletic Ass’n v. Sullivan, 867 F. 2d 22, 31 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Mazza, 792 F. 2d 1210, 1215 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1086, 107 S.Ct. 1290, 94 L.Ed.2d 147 (1987). VI. SOTO’S FIFTH AMENDMENT CLAIM Soto claims that the district court abused its discretion by not permitting him to testify concerning the shooting of Gu [*576] tierrez, and that due to this error, he was de…
• United States v. Rodriguez, 869 F.2d 479 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …75 U.S. at 196, 48 S.Ct. at 76, the warrant’s description of items need only be “ ‘reasonably specific, rather than elaborately detailed____’” United States v. Storage Spaces Designated Nos. 8 & 49, 111 F. 2d 1363, 1368 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1086, 107 S.Ct. 1291, 94 L.Ed.2d 148 (1987) (quoting United States v. Brock, 667 F. 2d 1311, 1322 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1022, 103 S.Ct. 1271, 75 L.Ed.2d 493 (1983)). [*487] In this case, the challenged language is particular in three asp…