AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., ET AL.

v.

DOOLEY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• O'Neal v. Burger Chef Sys., Inc., 860 F.2d 1341 (6th Cir. 1988)
  …the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit which ruled that the facts presented at trial would not support a finding of fraud on the part of Burger Chef or General Foods. Vaughn v. General Foods Corp., 797 F. 2d 1403 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1087, 107 S.Ct. 1293, 94 L.Ed.2d 149 (1987). In the interim period between the award and its subsequent reversal on appeal over a year later, dozens of disgruntled former Burger Chef franchise owners filed suit alleging theories of recovery based on fr…
• Williams v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 120 F.3d 1163 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …d 42 (Ga.App.1974). . Hendrix, 206 S.E. 2d at 44. . Id. . Id. . Id. at 45. . 860 F. 2d 1341 (6th Cir.1988). . Id. at 1349-50. . Id. at 1351. . Id. at 1351. . See Vaughn v. General Foods Cor., 797 F. 2d 1403, 1414 (7th Cir.1986), cert denied, 479 U.S. 1087, 107 S.Ct. 1293, 94 L.Ed.2d 149 (1987) (holding that even though Indiana law allows a duty, franchisor had no duty to disclose sale of the corporation to franchisees). . Id. at 1413-14. . Most jurisdictions hold that except in cases of franchise t…
• Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd., 868 F.2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1989)
  …ngement) we remarked that “[a]ll fact findings of a jury are non-advisory, unless made in an area expressly removed from jury verdict.” Shiley, Inc. v. Bentley Laboratories, Inc., 794 F. 2d 1561, 1568, 230 USPQ 112, 115 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1087, 107 S.Ct. 1291, 94 L.Ed.2d 148 (1987). It is established that the jury may decide the questions of anticipation and obviousness, either as separate special verdicts or en route to a verdict on the question of validity, which may also be decided by…