HUGH RINER, E. D. TISON AND RICHARD GRANT
v.
STATE
HUGH RINER, E. D. TISON AND RICHARD GRANT
STATE
131 Fla. 243
Florida Supreme Court (1938)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 179 So. 404
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Court having heretofore granted a Petition for Rehearing to the Plaintiff in Error, E. D. Tison, and having further, considered the cause upon the Transcript of the Record of the judgment of the Circuit Court and upon additional briefs .and argument submitted upon the rehearing, and being now fully advised in the premises, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment entered herein by this Court on July 29, 1937, *244affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court, should be and is now hereby reaffirmed, and it is so ordered.
Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Roberts v. State, 164 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1964)…tness through the suspect gun. An expert will be permitted to submit his opinion based on such an experiment conducted by him. The details of the experiment should be described to the jury. Riner v. State, 128 Fla. 848, 176 So. 38, Rehearing Denied, 131 Fla. 243, 179 So. 404; State v. Vuckovich, 61 Mont. 480, 203 P. 491; Edwards v. State, 198 Md. 132, 81 A. 2d 631, 83 A. 2d 578, 26 A.L.R.2d 874. In McKenna v. People, 124 Colo. 112, 235 P. 2d 351, it was held that the opinion of an expert based on the test…
-
North Miami v. Seaway Corp., 151 Fla. 301 (Fla. 1942)…and disputes appearing in the testimony on petition for a writ of certiorari. See Blue Belt Fertilizer Co. v. Pullen, 125 Fla. 164, 169 So. 615; Seven Seas, Inc., v. Buckholtz, 121 Fla. 205, 163 So. 567; Robbins Holding Co. v. Morris, 131 Fla. 205, 179 So. 404. The Seaway Corporation filed its amended declaration in the Civil Court of Record of Dade County against North Miami, a municipal corporation. One count of the amended declaration consisted of a common count for money had and received, while the s…
-
Wallendorf v. NEW York Life Ins. Co., 152 Fla. 574 (Fla. 1943)…by the circuit court. This Court is committed to the rule that it will not review on certiorari conflicts and disputes in the testimony. See Blue Belt Fertilizer Co. v. Pullen, 125 Fla. 164, 169 So. 615; Robbins Holding Co. v. Morris, 131 Fla. 205, 179 So. 404; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Poole, 147 Fla. 686, 3 So. (2nd) 386; Farnham v. Caldwell, 141 Fla. 416, 193 So. 286. It is next contended that the trial court did not or failed to observe the essential requirements of the law by admitting into evid…