ILLINOIS
v.
KENTUCKY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A Senior Judge was appointed as Special Master to manage proceedings and evidence collection.
The Court ordered the appointment of a Special Master to oversee the case, including filing pleadings, directing proceedings, and taking evidence.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Allocation Of Expenses cases and more on FLexlaw
It is ordered that the Honorable Robert Van Pelt, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, be appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.
The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct.
It is further ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court. [For earlier order herein, see 479 U. S. 879.]
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Crown Oil Corp. v. Lapidus Popcorn, Inc., 479 U.S. 879 (U.S. 1986)
- Young v. United States ex rel. Vuitton et Fils S. A., 479 U.S. 879 (U.S. 1986)