ETSI PIPELINE PROJECT

v.

MISSOURI ET AL.; AND HODEL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. V. MISSOURI ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Velez v. State, 596 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
  …onviction that followed a dual trial, four-jury proceeding. State v. Bowman, 588 A. 2d 728 (Me.1991); see also People v. Knight, 139 Ill.App.3d 188, 93 Ill.Dec. 521, 486 N.E. 2d 1356 (1985) (triple-jury proceeding; no prejudice found), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 905, 107 S.Ct. 1346, 94 L.Ed.2d 518 (1987). . See, e.g., State v. Lambright, 138 Ariz. 63, 673 P. 2d 1 (1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 892, 105 S.Ct. 267, 83 L.Ed.2d 203 (1984); Scarborough v. State, 50 Md.App. 276, 437 A. 2d 672 (1981). . It is not th…
• Pennell v. City OF SAN Jose, 485 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1988)
  …that the tenant hardship provisions were a “forced subsidy imposed on the landlord” in violation of the Takings Clause. Id., at 377, 721 P. 2d, at 1119. On appellants’ appeal to this Court we postponed consideration of the question of jurisdiction, 480 U. S. 905 (1987), and now having heard oral argument we affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court of California. The city of San Jose enacted its rent control ordinance (Ordinance) in 1979 with the stated purpose of “alleviating] some of the more immediate n…
• Westfall v. Erwin et ux., 484 U.S. 292 (U.S. 1988)
  …inappropriate, the court concluded, because respondents had “alleged undisputed facts sufficient to create a material question of whether or not [petitioners’] complained-of acts were discretionary.” 785 F. 2d, at 1553. [*295] We granted certiorari, 480 U. S. 905 (1987), to resolve the dispute among the Courts of Appeals as to whether conduct by federal officials must be discretionary in nature, as well as being within the scope of their employment, before the conduct is absolutely immune from state-law tort…