RHODEN

v.

LITTLES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Bolves v. Hullinger, 629 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
  …the liquidated damages be based on evidence that does not merely duplicate that needed for the compensatory damages, there must be some additional evidence of outrageous conduct. Dreyer v. Arco Chem. Co., 801 F. 2d 651 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 906, 107 S.Ct. 1348, 94 L.Ed.2d 519 (1987). See also Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston, 469 U.S. 111, 105 S.Ct. 613, 83 L.Ed.2d 523 (1985). We find that the evidence offered by Hullinger to demonstrate willfulness fell short as a matter of law. Th…
• NEW Port Largo, Inc. v. Monroe Cnty., 985 F.2d 1488 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …ccrual of a claim for limitations purposes”); McMillan v. Goleta Water Dist., 792 F. 2d 1453, 1457 (9th Cir.1986), (accrual occurs when claim ripe under Williamson, not when a property owner’s rights are interrupted by the regulation), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 906, 107 S.Ct. 1348, 94 L.Ed.2d 519 (1987); cf. Agins, 447 U.S. at 260, 100 S.Ct. at 2141 (mere enactment of ordinance does not constitute taking). When Williamson ’s two-prong test is met, the injury is complete, and the claim accrues for purposes of…
• United States v. U.S. Currency, 863 F.2d 555 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …vant factor that should have been given significant weight is not considered or when the court “fails to analyze the applicable factors.” United States v. Strawser, 800 F. 2d 704, 707 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, sub nom. Anderson v. United States, 480 U.S. 906, 107 S.Ct. 1350, 94 L.Ed.2d 521 (1987); In re American Reserve Corp., 841 F. 2d 159, 162 (7th Cir.1987) (abuse of discretion standard implies that the judge must actually exercise his discretion); United States v. Kramer, 827 F. 2d 1174, 1179 (8th C…