ROSANO

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez, 860 F.2d 706 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …ision superior to the defendant’s, United States v. Becton, 751 F. 2d 250, 254-55 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018, 105 S.Ct. 3480, 87 L.Ed.2d 615 (1985). See also United States v. Maull, 806 F. 2d 1340, 1343 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 907, 107 S.Ct. 1352, 94 L.Ed.2d 522 (1987); United States v. Losado, 674 F. 2d 167, 174 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1125, 102 S.Ct. 2945, 73 L.Ed.2d 1341 (1982). The Eighth Circuit has summarized nicely the nature of the government’s burden of pro…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1990)
  …the charges against him and was not unfairly surprised at trial as a consequence of the denial of the bill of particulars, the trial court has not abused its discretion.” United States v. Maull, 806 F. 2d 1340, 1345-46 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 907, 107 S.Ct. 1352, 94 L.Ed.2d 522 (1987). In view of the foregoing, it is clear that the district court acted well within its discretion in denying Cruz’ motion for a bill of particulars. G. Evidentiary Rulings. Flores, L. Rivera, Cruz and Coffie c…
• United States v. Paiva, 892 F.2d 148 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …ls will reverse a judgment of conviction only if the district court clearly abused its discretion in denying a bill of particulars. Wong Tai, 273 U.S. at 82, 47 S.Ct. at 302; United States v. Maull, 806 F. 2d 1340, 1345 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 907, 107 S.Ct. 1352, 94 L.Ed.2d 522 (1987). To establish such an abuse of discretion requiring reversal, a defendant must demonstrate actual surprise at trial or actual prejudice to his substantial rights. Leach, 427 F. 2d at 1110; United States v. Mont…