TRAYNOR

v.

TURNAGE, ADMINISTRATOR, VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION, ET AL.; MCKELVEY V. TURNAGE, ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (U.S. 1990)
  …ty Div., 450 U. S. 707 (1981), the court concluded that respondents were entitled to payment of unemployment benefits. Smith v. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources, 301 Ore. 209, 217-219, 721 P. 2d 445, 449-450 (1986). We granted certiorari. 480 U. S. 916 (1987). Before this Court in 1987, petitioner continued to maintain that the illegality of respondents’ peyote consumption was relevant to their constitutional claim. We agreed, concluding that “if a State has prohibited through its criminal laws…
• Murray v. United States, 487 U.S. 533 (U.S. 1988)
  …st Circuit affirmed, assuming for purposes of its-decision that the first entry into the warehouse was unlawful. United States v. Moscatiello, 771 F. 2d 589 (1985). Murray and Carter then separately filed petitions for certiorari, which we granted,1 480 U. S. 916 (1987), and have consolidated here. II The exclusionary rule prohibits introduction into evidence of tangible materials seized during an unlawful search, Weeks v. United States, 232 U. S. 383 (1914), and of testimony concerning knowledge acquired…
• Traynor v. Turnage, 485 U.S. 535 (U.S. 1988)
  …sions challenged under the Rehabilitation Act are subject to judicial review and, if so, whether that Act bars the Veterans’ Administration from characterizing petitioners’ alcoholism as “willful misconduct” for purposes of 38 U. S. C. § 1662(a)(1). 480 U. S. 916 (1987). II We must first consider whether §211(a)’s bar against judicial review of “the decisions of the Administrator on any question of law or fact under any law administered by the Veterans’ Administration providing benefits for veterans” ex [*…