MEYER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• State v. Beckman, 547 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
  …rnography in the home and the applicability of the Stanley exception thereto, we agree with the resolution of the issue reached by the Ohio Supreme Court in State v. Meadows, 28 Ohio St.3d 43, 28 Ohio St.3d 354, 503 N.E. 2d 697 (1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 936, 107 S.Ct. 1581, 94 L.Ed.2d 771 (1987). Meadows found that the same compelling state interests which the Ferber court found for eradicating child pornography from the production and distribution chain also existed for eradicating possession of child…
• Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (U.S. 1990)
  …850091 (Ohio Ct. App., Dec. 18, 1985) (Doan, J., concurring) (“The reservation [in footnote 11 of Stanley] applies to traitorous or seditious materials, and not to child pornography”), rev’d, 28 Ohio St. 3d 43, 503 N. E. 2d 697 (1986), cert. denied, 480 U. S. 936 (1987); see also Meadows, 28 Ohio St. 3d, at 356-357, 503 N. E. 2d, at 716 (Brown, J., concurring). Although our decisions even in the First Amendment area have taken special note of the paramount importance of national security interests, see, e.…
• United States v. Flores, 875 F.2d 1110 (5th Cir. 1989)
  …ther drug trafficking is a crime of violence is "at best, ambiguous."). However, other courts that have considered the same issue as Cruz have found § 16(b) unambiguous. See United States v. Meyer, 803 F. 2d 246, 248-49 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 936, 107 S.Ct. 1580, 94 L.Ed.2d 770 (1987) (Section 16(b) not ambiguous on issue of drug trafficking.). Flores’ further assertion based on Cruz is also without merit. He alleges that the trial judge in this case, in making his determination that the pa…