TALBOTT

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States v. Adler, 879 F.2d 491 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …ine do not establish membership in a conspiracy to distribute. We review de novo a district court’s refusal to give a jury instruction on defendant’s theory of the case. United States v. Doubleday, 804 F. 2d 1091, 1093 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005, 107 S.Ct. 1628, 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987). Generally, whether the instructions are sufficient is decided by reviewing the instructions as a whole, United States v. Hayes, 794 F. 2d 1348, 1351 (9th Cir.1986), and a district court is not required to give…
• United States v. Donaciano Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …w incorrectly” reviewed de novo). Similarly, a district court’s failure to instruct on a defendant’s theory of the case is subject to de novo review. United States v. Doubleday, 804 F. 2d 1091, 1093 (9th Cir.1986) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005, 107 S.Ct. 1628, 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987). It is not error, however, to reject a theory-of-the-case instruction if the other instructions in their entirety cover the defense theory. United States v. Kenny, 645 F. 2d 1323, 1337 (9th Cir.), cert. denie…
• United States v. Sotelo-Murillo, 887 F.2d 176 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …review”); Ibarra-Alcarez, 830 F. 2d at 973 (failure to instruct jury on good faith reliance on advice of counsel); United States v. Doubleday, 804 F. 2d 1091, 1093 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam) (refusal to give self-defense instruction), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005, 107 S.Ct. 1628, 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987). See also United States v. Brandon, 633 F. 2d 773, 778 (9th Cir.1980) (implicitly applying a de novo standard to refusal to give entrapment instruction). An intra-circuit conflict may be resolved authoritative…