JAMES

v.

IOWA

Citator

Cited By

• Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. v. Nat'l Ctr. for Immigrants' Rights, Inc., 502 U.S. 183 (U.S. 1991)
  …hich cast serious doubt on the Court of Appeals’ conclusion that employment of undocumented aliens was only a “peripheral concern” of the immigration laws, we vacated that court’s judgment and remanded for further consideration in the light of IRCA. 481 U. S. 1009 (1987). On remand, the District Court adhered to its original opinion that the Attorney General’s discretion to impose bond conditions is “limited to those [conditions] aimed at obtaining an undocumented worker’s appearance at' future immigration pr…
• Flores v. Meese, 934 F.2d 991 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …g that the INS lacks statutory authority to issue the minor detention regulation, Flores seeks to invoke our prior decision in National Center for Immigrants’ Rights v. INS, 791 F. 2d 1351 (9th Cir.1986) (National Center), cert. granted and vacated, 481 U.S. 1009, 1009-10, 107 S.Ct. 1881, 1882, 95 L.Ed.2d 489 (yacating and remanding for reconsideration in light of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986), on remand, 818 F. 2d 869 (9th Cir. 1987) (remanding to district court). In National Center, we held…
• Nat'l Ctr. FOR Immigrants' Rights, Inc. v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 913 F.2d 1350 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …ird appeal to this court regarding this matter. Our earlier opinions, 743 F. 2d 1365 (9th Cir.1984), 791 F. 2d 1351 (9th Cir.1986) were vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA). 481 U.S. 1009 (1987). On remand, the district court reiterated its earlier holding that the regulations were not authorized by the statute, and further held that the Attorney General’s power to impose the blanket bond condition had not been modified or increased…

  ← 1 / 2 →