CANISIUS COLLEGE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (47 total)

• Love v. United States, 871 F.2d 1488 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …would be actionable in tort if committed by a private party under analogous circumstances, under the law of the state where the act or omission occurred. 28 U.S.C. § 2674; LaBarge v. Mariposa County, 798 F. 2d 364, 366 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014, 107 S.Ct. 1889, 95 L.Ed.2d 497 (1987). Under Montana law, statutory requirements governing disposal of secured property by the mortgagee or lienholder, including the requirement of notice to the debtor, must be followed strictly. Goggins v. Bookout…
• United States v. Spears, 965 F.2d 262 (7th Cir. 1992)
  …e time during which the conspiracy was operative, and the statute allegedly violated. United States v. Sweeney, 688 F. 2d 1131 (7th Cir.1982). It need not allege any overt acts. United States v. Dempsey, 806 F. 2d 766 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014, 107 S.Ct. 1889, 95 L.Ed.2d 497 (1987). The superseding indictment here does allege overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy, which occurred within a specific time frame, all in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. See Superseding Indictment, Rec., Do…
• Salim Aoude v. Mobil OIL Corp., 862 F.2d 890 (1st Cir. 1988)
  …a preliminary injunction rests are “statements as to probable outcomes,” nothing more. Goyco de Maldonado v. Rivera, 849 F. 2d 683, 686 (1st Cir.1988); Jimenez Fuentes v. Torres Gaztambide, 807 F. 2d 236, 238 (1st Cir.1986) (en banc), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014, 107 S.Ct. 1888, 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987). Because final resolution of factual conflicts is reserved to time of trial (absent a stipulation by the parties or an order of court merging the hearings on preliminary and permanent in-junctive relief, see…