STOREY ET AL.
v.
GEORGIA
STOREY ET AL.
GEORGIA
481 U.S. 1017
Supreme Court of the United States (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ela F. DE Cisneros v. Younger, 871 F.2d 305 (2d Cir. 1989)…DISCUSSION We note at the outset that review of a district court’s decision to stay a case on abstention grounds is limited to an abuse of discretion standard. See Law Enforcement Ins. Co. v. Corcoran, 807 F. 2d 38, 40 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1017, 107 S.Ct. 1896, 95 L.Ed.2d 503 (1987). The practical reason for this deference is that Colorado River abstention requires an ad hoc balancing of a number of factors, and the district court generally has a better seat for an overview of whether the…1 / 2
-
Young v. United States Dep't OF Just., 882 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1989)…favor of the exercise of jurisdiction.” Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 16, 103 S.Ct. 927, 937, 74 L.Ed.2d 765 (1983); see Law Enforcement Insurance Co. v. Corcoran, 807 F. 2d 38, 40 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1017, 107 S.Ct. 1896, 95 L.Ed.2d 503 (1987). Our decision in this case is also guided by the principle that federal courts should leave for state court determination “difficult questions of state law bearing on policy problems of substantial public impo…