THOMPKINS

v.

GEORGIA

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62 (U.S. 1990)
  …Petka, 711 F. 2d 798, 800-801 (CA7 1983). Bavoso v. Harding, 507 F. Supp. 313, 316 (SDNY 1980). Barnes v. Bosley, 745 F. 2d 501, 508 (CA8 1984), cert. denied, 471 U. S. 1017 (1985). Bauer v. Bosley, 802 F. 2d 1058, 1063 (CA8 1986), cert. denied, 481 U. S. 1038 (1987). Elrod v. Burns, 427 U. S. 347, 351 (1976). Balogh v. Charron, 855 F. 2d 356 (CA6 1988). Abraham v. Pekarski, 537 F. Supp. 858, 865 (ED Pa. 1982), aff’d in part and dism’d in part, 728 F. 2d 167 (CA3), cert. denied, 467 U. S. 1242 (1984).…
• United States v. Manganellis, 864 F.2d 528 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …s addressing the question of whether evidence [*535] of the defendant’s intent was relevant but too prejudicial, not whether section 841(a)(1) is a specific intent crime. The facts in United States v. Nichols, 808 F. 2d 660 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 481 U.S. 1038, 107 S.Ct. 1976, 95 L.Ed.2d 816 (1987), are similar to those in our case. There, the defendant was convicted of distributing cocaine (selling four ounces to an FBI informant), in violation of section 841(a)(1). The government’s direct evidence consi…
• United States v. Jones, 965 F.2d 1507 (8th Cir. 1992)
  …ns did not involve dishonesty or false statements. Therefore, under Federal Rule of Evidence 609, Sand [*1514] ers’s arrest was clearly inadmissible for purposes of impeachment. United States v. Nichols, 808 F. 2d 660, 664 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1038, 107 S.Ct. 1976, 95 L.Ed.2d 816 (1987). D. Prosecution Remarks Appellants allege that the prosecutor made prejudicial statements during the rebuttal portion of her closing argument. The remark by the prosecutor, which concerns this court the most,…