MCCOY ET AL.

v.

HEARST CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Drewery Geter v. State, 115 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
  …decided. E.g., Perry v. State, 395 So. 2d 170, 174 (Fla.1980). The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has expressly held Lockett to be retroactive. Songer v. Wainwright, 769 F. 2d 1488, 1489 (11th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, Dugger v. Songer, 481 U.S. 1041, 107 S.Ct. 1982, 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987).... Thus, a judge who fails to consider or is precluded from considering nonstatutory mitigating circumstances commits reversible error whether sentence was imposed post-or pre-Lockett. In Harvard v. State, 48…
• Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techplosion, Inc., 261 F.3d 1188 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …s well as protective. In fashioning relief against a party who has transgressed the governing legal standards, a court of equity is free to proscribe activities that, standing alone, would have been unassailable.”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041, 107 S.Ct. 1983, 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987). Nor do Appellants explain how the wording of the injunction could lend itself to alternate interpretations. In the absence of any apparent contextual ambiguities or alternate readings prohibiting legal condu…
• Andrews v. City OF Philadelphia & Wilson W. Goode, 895 F.2d 1469 (3d Cir. 1990)
  …(4) the discrimination would detrimentally affect a reasonable person of the same sex in that position; and (5) the existence of respondeat superior liability. Cf. Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F. 2d 611, 619-20 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041, 107 S.Ct. 1983, 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987). [*1483] It is particularly important to note that these factors include both a subjective standard (No. 3) and an objective standard (No. 4). The subjective factor is crucial because it demonstrates that the…