WILLIE BROWN, PETITIONER,
v.
LEWIS MANUFACTURING COMPANY AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, AN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY, RESPONDENTS
WILLIE BROWN, PETITIONER,
LEWIS MANUFACTURING COMPANY AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, AN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY, RESPONDENTS
220 So. 2d 6
Florida Supreme Court (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date Sept. 18, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petitioner’s request for attorneys’ fees is also denied.
DREW, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shingleton v. Bussey, 223 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 1969)…y the injured plaintiff against the insured, but, rather, as the undisclosed guardian of the interests and rights of the insured — and of course, of the insurer’s interest also. See In re Rules Governing Conduct of Attorneys in Florida, (Fla. 1969), 220 So. 2d 6. In such cases, it is hard to imagine all of the many difficulties which could operate to impede the injured third party plaintiff from ferreting out and having adjudicated his rights of adequate remedy against the insured and the insurer when he is…
-
Beta ETA House Corp. v. Gregory, 230 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)…by the injured plaintiff against the insured, but, rather, as the undisclosed guardian of the interests and rights of the insured — and of course, of the insurer’s interest also. See In re Rules Governing Conduct of Attorneys in Florida, (Fla.1969), 220 So. 2d 6. In such cases, it is hard to imagine all of the many difficulties which could operate to impede the injured third party plaintiff from ferreting out and having adjudicated his rights of adequate remedy against the insured and the insurer when he is…
-
Fisher v. State, 248 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 1971)…attorney defending an insured pursuant to contract with an auto liability insurer, against a suit of an injured third party beneficiary, is well aware of the nature of his undertaking. See In re Rules Governing Conduct of Attorneys in Florida, Fla., 220 So. 2d 6. There, we said: “We do not hold that a third party may not ethically pay the cost of legal services to be rendered by a lawyer to a particular client. We do hold that in such a situation the lawyer owes undivided loyalty to the client whom he purp…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence