HARRISON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Larry Thomas (87-1623), 875 F.2d 559 (6th Cir. 1989)
  …d at trial and, thus, waived his right to object. Because he has not demonstrated any prejudice resulting from the mistaken trial transcript, E. Gaston is not entitled to relief. See Bransford v. Brown, 806 F. 2d 83, 86 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1056, 107 S.Ct. 2198, 95 L.Ed.2d 853 (1987). A. Gaston also argues, on appeal, that he was deprived of a fair trial because the prosecutor suggested to the jury, without evidentiary support, that there had been threats made to government witnesses. A. G…
• United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708) & George Mooneyham (89-5710), 977 F.2d 222 (6th Cir. 1992)
  …the proceedings would have been different is hollow. Morrow’s legal assistance was at least adequate. He is not entitled to the most canny lawyer available, only an adequate one. Flippins v. United States, 808 F. 2d 16, 19 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1056, 107 S.Ct. 2197, 95 L.Ed.2d 852 (1987). Having received constitutionally effective counsel, Morrow’s Sixth Amendment argument must fail. VIII Morrow contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his three-count conviction. Mooneyham plead…
• White v. State, 939 F.2d 912 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …rmined that in a federal habeas corpus case brought by a state prisoner, the absence of a perfect transcript does not violate due process absent a showing of specific prejudice. See Bransford v. Brown, 806 F. 2d 83, 86 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1056, 107 S.Ct. 2198, 95 L.Ed.2d 853 (1987); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 698 F. 2d 940, 941-42 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1135, 103 S.Ct. 3120, 77 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1983). We are persuaded by the reasoning of the sixth and eighth circuits. Accordingly, we…