DEAKINS ET AL.

v.

MONAGHAN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bus. Elecs. Corp. v. Sharp Elecs. Corp., 485 U.S. 717 (U.S. 1988)
  …rtical restraint is per se illegal under § 1 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1, only if there is an express or implied agreement to set resale prices at some level. 780 F. 2d 1212, 1215-1218 (1986). We granted certiorari, 482 U. S. 912 (1987), to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeals regarding the proper dividing line between the rule that vertical price restraints are illegal per se and the rule that vertical nonprice restraints are to be judged under the rule of reason.1 […
• Deakins v. Monaghan, 484 U.S. 193 (U.S. 1988)
  …tion to Suggestion 2; Tr. of Oral Arg. 6-7 and 22. See Memorandum for Respondents Suggesting that Cause is Moot 3; Brief for Respondents 18; Tr. of Oral Arg. 22, 24-25. This Court rejected respondents’ suggestion of mootness filed before argument. 482 U. S. 912 (1987). Representations of counsel in response to inquiries at oral argument now have persuaded us that the suggestion is sound as to the first question presented. The Court’s ability to prevent respondents from renewing their claims after they are…