IN RE CALDWELL
IN RE CALDWELL
483 U.S. 1004
Supreme Court of the United States (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 17 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Tr., 487 U.S. 977 (U.S. 1988)…(1988), cert. pending, No. 87-1387; Griffin v. Carlin, 755 F. 2d 1516, 1522-1525 (CA11 1985). Cf. Segar v. Smith, 238 U. S. App. D. C. 103, 738 F. 2d 1249(1984), cert. denied, 471 U. S. 1115 (1985). We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict. 483 U. S. 1004 (1987). II A Section 703 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U. S. C. §20Q0e-2, provides: “(a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer— “(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discrimin…
-
MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Serv., Inc., 486 U.S. 825 (U.S. 1988)
-
Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers et ux., 485 U.S. 197 (U.S. 1988)…gitimate objections. After the Eighth Circuit — sharply divided — denied rehearing en banc, id., at 414-415, petitioners sought review by this Court. We granted certiorari to consider the Court of Appeals’ application of the absolute priority rule, 483 U. S. 1004 (1987), and now reverse. II As the Court of Appeals stated, the absolute priority rule “provides that a dissenting class of unsecured creditors must be provided for in full before any junior class can receive or retain any property [under a reorga…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence