DAVIS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Solomon Philip Panitz, 907 F.2d 1267 (1st Cir. 1990)
• Cross v. City OF DES Moines, 965 F.2d 629 (8th Cir. 1992)
  …as directly contrary to Cross’s claim. See, e.g., United States v. Hepperle, 810 F. 2d 836, 839 (8th Cir.) (noting that it is not unconstitutional to proceed with a search in the absence of the physical presence of the search warrant), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1025, 107 S.Ct. 3274, 97 L.Ed.2d 772 (1987); Washington v. Simpson, 806 F. 2d 192, 196 n. 4 (8th Cir.1986) ("federal constitutional law does not require the actual possession of a warrant if the arresting officer has knowledge of its existence”).…
• United States v. Reis, 906 F.2d 284 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …t additional exigent circumstances be demonstrated before the automobile exception is applicable, see, e.g., United States v. Alexander, 835 F. 2d 1406, 1409-10 (11th Cir.1988); United States v. Hepperle, 810 F. 2d 836, 840 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1025, 107 S.Ct. 3274, 97 L.Ed.2d 772 (1987), circumstances such as those found in this case — the car parked outside the arrestee’s residence, with the possibility of either the registered owner or family members of the arrestee removing the car or destr…