HOLZER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• van Poyck v. State, 564 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 1990)
  …, we affirm each of Van Poyck’s convictions and sentences. It is so ordered. SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, ehrlich, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur. * See, e.g., Copeland v. Wainwright, 505 So. 2d 425 (Fla.), vacated on other grounds, 484 U.S. 807, 108 S.Ct. 55, 98 L.Ed.2d 19 (1987); Jackson v. State, 502 So. 2d 409 (Fla.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 920, 107 S.Ct. 3198, 96 L.Ed.2d 686 (1987).…
• State v. Stewart, 588 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …an effort to exclude the statements, does not by itself render the statements involuntary within the meaning of the due process clause of the United States Constitution. Copeland v. Wainwright, 505 So. 2d 425 (Fla.1987), reversed on other grounds, 484 U.S. 807, 108 S.Ct. 55, 98 L.Ed.2d 19 (1987); see also Keeton v. State, 427 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Myles v. State, 399 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The trial court found that no coercion had been exercised upon the defendant. Accordingly, we rever…
• Copeland v. Dugger, 565 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 1990)
  …PER CURIAM. We have on remand from the United States Supreme Court the case of Copeland v. Dugger, 484 U.S. 807, 108 S.Ct. 55, 98 L.Ed.2d 19 (1987), reversing Copeland v. Wainwright, 505 So. 2d 425 (Fla.1987). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(l, 7 & 9), Fla. Const.1 The sole issue presented by this remand is whether the sentencing hearing that resulted i…