SUNSHINE BISCUITS, INC.

v.

APPONI ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (41 total)

• Feist Publ'ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (U.S. 1991)
  …the “sweat of the brow” doctrine in Jeweler’s Circular Publishing Co., has now fully repudiated the reasoning of that decision. See, e. g., Financial Information, Inc. v. Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., 808 F. 2d 204, 207 (CA2 1986), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 820 (1987); Financial Information, Inc. v. Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., 751 F. 2d 501, 510 (CA2 1984) (Newman, J., concurring); Hoehling v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 618 F. 2d 972, 979 (CA2 1980). Even those scholars who believe that “industri…
• Lohorn v. Michal, 913 F.2d 327 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …and that the moving party is entitled to the judgment as a matter of law.’ ” Id. (quoting Wolf v. City of Fitchburg, 870 F. 2d 1327, 1329 (7th Cir.1989) (quoting Colan v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc., 812 F. 2d 357, 360 (7th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 820, 108 S.Ct. 79, 98 L.Ed.2d 42 (1987))). A motion for summary judgment is not an appropriate occasion for weighing the evidence; rather, the inquiry is limited to determining if there is a genuine issue for trial. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477…
• Peckham v. Cont'l Cas. Ins. Co., 895 F.2d 830 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …wide discretion anent the admission and exclusion of expert testimony, and his decisions are to be sustained unless his discretion has been abused.” Allied Int’l, Inc. v. International Longshoremen’s Ass’n, 814 F. 2d 32, 40 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 820, 108 S.Ct. 79, 98 L.Ed.2d 41 (1987); see also United States v. Ladd, 885 F. 2d 954, 959 (1st Cir.1989); Freeman v. Package Machinery Co., 865 F. 2d 1331, 1338 (1st Cir.1988); United States v. Hoffman, 832 F. 2d 1299, 1310 (1st Cir.1987); Marshall, 8…