TEAL

v.

BUCKNER ET UX.

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• United States v. Smith, 918 F.2d 1501 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …a kingpin, only a supervisor or manager. Id. at 776. The government may establish the element of derivation of substantial income or resources by circumstantial evidence. U.S. v. Draine, 811 F. 2d 1419, 1421 (11th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 827, 108 S.Ct. 94, 98 L.Ed.2d 55 (1987); U.S. v. Phillips, 664 F. 2d 971, 1035 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136, 102 S.Ct. 2965, 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982). The record contains ample evidence that large amounts of cocaine and tens of tho…
• United States v. Gonzalez, 940 F.2d 1413 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …the government shows, by either direct or circumstantial evidence, that the defendant derived substantial income or resources from his operation of the entire enterprise. See United States v. Draine, 811 F. 2d 1419, 1421 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 827, 108 S.Ct. 94, 98 L.Ed.2d 55 (1987); Chagra, 669 F. 2d at 256. Thus, a defendant’s acquisition of substantial income or resources from a continuing criminal enterprise may be demonstrated either by proof that defendant acquired substantial resource…
• Deloach v. Delchamps, Inc., 897 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1990)
  …ntiff offers additional evidence. B. Standard of Review A party is entitled to a new trial when the jury verdict is against the great weight of evidence. See Rousseau v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc., 812 F. 2d 971, 972 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 827, 108 S.Ct. 95, 98 L.Ed.2d 56 (1987). We review the denial of a motion for new trial for an abuse of discretion. King v. Exxon Co., 618 F. 2d 1111, 1115 (5th Cir.1980). Deloach presented evidence that drew the basis for his discharge into question a…