CROCKETT

v.

UNITED STATES; AND CREWS V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Edison Jordan, 915 F.2d 622 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …uld pursue relief before the sentencing judge by filing a motion at any time during service of the sentence under the version of Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) then in existence. See, e.g., United States v. Dawson, 790 F. 2d 1565 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 834, 108 S.Ct. 111, 98 L.Ed.2d 71 (1987); United States v. Shillingford, 586 F. 2d 372 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Cevallos, 538 F. 2d 1122 (5th Cir.1976). And third, an individual convicted of a federal offense could initiate habeas corpus proceed…
• United States v. Brooks, 957 F.2d 1138 (4th Cir. 1992)
  …action indicating his participation.” United States v. Collazo, 732 F. 2d 1200, 1205 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1105, 105 S.Ct. 777, 83 L.Ed.2d 773 (1985); accord United States v. Crockett, 813 F. 2d 1310, 1316 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 834, 108 S.Ct. 112, 98 L.Ed.2d 71 (1987). Once it has been shown that a conspiracy exists, the evidence need only establish a slight connection between the defendant and the conspiracy to support conviction. United States v. Seni, 662 F. 2d 277, 285 n…
• United States v. Arias-Santana, 964 F.2d 1262 (1st Cir. 1992)
  …6 L.Ed.2d 287 (1991) (statement is inculpatory, and triggers Sixth Amendment right of confrontation, only if “fairly understood to incriminate the accused.”) (emphasis added); United States v. Crockett, 813 F. 2d 1310, 1314 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 834, 108 S.Ct. 112, 98 L.Ed.2d 71 (1987) (“animating purposes” of Sixth Amendment suggest that “adversity” of witness be evaluated in light of actual content of testimony, rather than by “formalistic categories” as to which party called witness); cf. Un…