STRINGER

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Reyes, 908 F.2d 281 (8th Cir. 1990)
  …tion to renew term), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 849, 106 S.Ct. 143, 88 L.Ed.2d 119 (1985); see also United States v. Ramirez, 810 F. 2d 1338, 1341 (5th Cir.) (no reasonable expectation of privacy in hotel room after rental period expired), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844, 108 S.Ct. 136, 98 L.Ed.2d 93 (1987). Reyes argues that this conclusion is in error for several reasons. First, he argues that he cannot be denied standing even if his rental period had expired because he was prevented by the government due to his…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Ramirez, 894 F.2d 565 (2d Cir. 1990)
  …to have occurred since that is a determination of fact left to the jury. Thus, we think the charge was “sufficiently balanced ... to enable the jury to consider the issue fairly.” United States v. Castro, 813 F. 2d 571, 578 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844, 108 S.Ct. 137, 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987). Further, the testimony of Detective Villegas that he was following the defendants who had to be forced to the side of the road constituted a proper factual predicate, based on which the jury could reasonably fin…
• Woods v. Thieret, 903 F.2d 1080 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …Cir.1986) (holding that directive charging prison staff with using professional judgment, albeit within specific guidelines, did not create liberty interest because directive was intended to guide prison officials rather than inmates), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844, 108 S.Ct. 186, 98 L.Ed.2d 93 (1987). Nor does the provision for review of the shift supervisor’s decision create a liberty interest where, as here, the reviewing officer’s decision, like that of the official initially placing the inmate in tempora…