GENERAL AMERICAN COMMUNICATIONS CORP. ET AL.

v.

NOTTINGHAM ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Temple v. Synthes Corp., Ltd., 498 U.S. 5 (U.S. 1990)
  …Screen Service Corp., 349 U. S. 322, 329-330 (1955); Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co., 225 U. S. 111, 132 (1912). See also Nottingham v. General American Communications Corp., 811 F. 2d 873, 880 (CA5) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 854 (1987). Nothing in the 1966 revision of Rule 19 changed that principle. See Provident Bank, supra, at 116-117, n. 12. The Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 19(a) explicitly state that “a tortfeasor with the usual ‘joint-and-several’ liability is mere…
• Petitti v. NEW England Tel. & Tel. Co., 909 F.2d 28 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …claims, granting NET’s requests. On appeal the two judgments will be dealt with seriatim. STANDARD OF REVIEW Both denial and grants of summary judgment are reviewed de novo. E.g., Idaho v. Hodel, 814 F. 2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 854, 108 S.Ct. 159, 98 L.Ed.2d 114 (1987). Summary judgment is appropriate when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material…
• White v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., 899 F.2d 555 (6th Cir. 1990)
  …This court will not decide issues or claims not litigated before the district court. Boddie v. American Broadcasting Cos., Inc., 881 F. 2d 267, 268 n. 1 (6th Cir.1989); Yeiter v. Sec. Health and Human Svcs., 818 F. 2d 8, 11 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 854, 108 S.Ct. 160, 98 L.Ed.2d 115 (1987). Appellant’s request that his complaint be interpreted so as to infer a discrimination claim under article 14 of the NMATA stretches the Conley v. Gibson rule of liberality to an unwarranted extreme and is offen…