DEMPEWOLF

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Burton, 937 F.2d 324 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …ty of Willis. On that basis, I must conclude that there was no violation of the confrontation clause. See Nance v. Fairman, 707 F. 2d 936, 942 & n. 7 (7th Cir.1983). See also United States v. Dempewolf, 817 F. 2d 1318, 1321 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 903, 108 S.Ct. 245, 98 L.Ed.2d 203 (1987).…
• United States v. Badger, 983 F.2d 1443 (7th Cir. 1993)
  …nswered his own question “Absolutely not. It makes no sense.” (Tr. 1676). This statement, when considered in isolation, is an improper vouching for the credibility of a witness. United States v. Swiatek, 819 F. 2d 721, 731 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 484 U.S. 903, 108 S.Ct. 245, 98 L.Ed.2d 203 (1987). [*1452] Because the prosecutor’s statements about the agent were improper in isolation, we must then consider the statements in the context of the trial to determine whether they were invited by the defense. If…