DEHNHOFF

v.

VINYARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Fortner v. A.G. Thomas, 983 F.2d 1024 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …. It is well established in this circuit that a motion to dismiss is not considered a responsive pleading for purposes of rule 15(a). Driscoll v. Smith Barney, Harris, Upham & Co., 815 F. 2d 655, 659 (11th Cir.1987), vacated in part on other grounds 484 U.S. 909, 108 S.Ct. 253, 98 L.Ed.2d 211 (1987), cert. denied in part 484 U.S. 914, 108 S.Ct. 261, 98 L.Ed.2d 218 (1987); Chilivis v. Securities & Exchange Comm’n, 673 F. 2d 1205, 1209 (11th Cir.1982); McGruder v. Phelps, 608 F. 2d 1023, 1025 (5th Cir.1979).…
• Wheat v. Green, 993 F.2d 814 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …rshall Securities. There were customer agreements between the other five Appellants and Marshall Securities. . Driscoll v. Smith Barney, Harris, Upham & Co., 815 F. 2d 655 (11th Cir.), vacated sub nom. Smith Barney, Harris, Upham & Co. v. Adrian, 484 U.S. 909, 108 S.Ct. 253, 98 L.Ed.2d 211 (1987); Coleman v. Prudential Bache Sec., Inc., 802 F. 2d 1350 (11th Cir.1986); Republic of Nicaragua v. Standard Fruit Co., 937 F. 2d 469, 474 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1294, 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1…