BEAUFORD

v.

SISTERS OF MERCY, PROVINCE OF DETROIT, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Fausto D. Ruiz, 905 F.2d 499 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …admission of certain coconspirator testimony. To a large extent, the protest is procedurally defaulted because appellant failed to lodge seasonable objections below. See, e.g., United States v. Cin-tolo, 818 F. 2d 980, 999 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913, 108 S.Ct. 259, 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987); see also Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(1). In any event, perscrutation of the record convinces us that, wholly apart from waiver, the district court’s rulings in respect to the challenged evidence complied with the rele…
• United States v. Mena, 933 F.2d 19 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …roached the cockpit and made his move during the flight. See, e.g., United States v. Cintolo, 818 F. 2d 980, 989-91 (1st Cir.) (a defendant's intent can be inferred from his conduct, seen in light of all the surrounding circumstances), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913, 108 S.Ct. 259, 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987); United States v. Vigil-Montanel, 753 F. 2d 996, 999 (11th Cir.1985) (similar). . Contrary to Mena's imprecation, the pilot's testimony that, in his opinion, "[t]here was no hijacking" did not mandate a differe…
• United States v. Nazzaro, 889 F.2d 1158 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …conspiracy case that the conspirators’ motives, designs, and objectives can “transmogrify [an] innocent transaction into an overt act carrying undeniable criminal consequences.” United States v. Cintolo, 818 F. 2d 980, 993 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913, 108 S.Ct. 259, 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987); see also Badders v. United States, 240 U.S. 391, 394, 36 S.Ct. 367, 368, 60 L.Ed. 706 (1916) (“intent may make an otherwise innocent act criminal, if it is a step in a plot”) (Holmes, J.). These cases have pe…