MILLER

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Anne Healey Randall v. Walther Guenther, 650 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …fined to the statutory parameters. In this regard, the immunity granted applies only to criminal proceedings, not civil proceedings. See DeBock v. State, 512 So. 2d 164, 167 (Fla.) (statute inapplicable to bar disciplinary proceedings), stay denied, 484 U.S. 919, 108 S.Ct. 282, 98 L.Ed.2d 243 (1987), and cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1025, 108 S.Ct. 748, 98 L.Ed.2d 761 (1988); Intelligence Group, Inc. v. Department of State, 610 So. 2d 589, 591 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (statute inapplicable to administrative proceeding…
• Alvarado v. United States, 497 U.S. 543 (U.S. 1990)
  …t unusual for us to grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and direct reconsideration in light of the representations made by the United States in this Court. See, e. g., Biddle v. United States, 484 U. S. 1054 (1988); Malone v. United States, 484 U. S. 919 (1987). Nor is it novel to do so in a case where error is conceded but it is suggested that there is another ground on which the decision below could be affirmed if the case were brought here. Indeed, a case decided earlier this Term presented such…
• United States v. Horacio Alvarado, 923 F.2d 253 (2d Cir. 1991)
  …for reconsideration in light of the Solicitor General’s position. See Chappell v. United States, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 1800, 108 L.Ed.2d 931 (1990); Biddle v. United States, 484 U.S. 1054, 108 S.Ct. 1004, 98 L.Ed.2d 971 (1988); Malone v. United States, 484 U.S. 919, 108 S.Ct. 278, 98 L.Ed .2d 239 (1987). . The Supreme Court’s opinion leaves some ambiguity as to whether we may consider both the existence of a prima facie case and the adequacy of the prosecutor’s explanations, or only the latter issue. In paper…