HEARD, SHERIFF

v.

CURRY

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Harris v. Chapman, 97 F.3d 499 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …escapees. Id. at 1506-07. Under the “substantial governmental interest” standard, this court has repeatedly found that such rules were permissible for those reasons. See, e.g., Brightly v. Wainwright, 814 F. 2d 612, 613 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944, 108 S.Ct. 332, 98 L.Ed.2d 359 (1987); Maimon v. Wainwright, 792 F. 2d 133 (11th Cir.1986); Shabazz v. Barnauskas, 790 F. 2d 1536, 1540 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011, 107 S.Ct. 655, 93 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986). The RFRA, passed by Congress in…
• Louie N. Elias v. W.H. Connett, 908 F.2d 521 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …aim which would entitle him to relief.’ ” Durning v. First Boston Corp., 815 F. 2d 1265, 1267 (9th Cir.) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-02, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)), cert. denied, Wyoming Community Dev. Auth. v. Durning, 484 U.S. 944, 108 S.Ct. 330, 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987). In considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the district court may consider material properly submitted as part of the complaint. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., 883 F. 2d at 1441 n. 18; see also…
• United States v. Doran, 882 F.2d 1511 (10th Cir. 1989)
  …sonable inference that given extra time to analyze the evidence, the Government legitimately decided the new theory of liability was appropriate.5 Our analysis here is supported by United States v. Marrapese, 826 F. 2d 145 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944, 108 S.Ct. 331, 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987). There, the trial of a defendant initially charged with conspiring to suborn perjury ended in a mistrial because the jury could not reach a verdict. After the mistrial, the defendant challenged the composition…