IN RE SAFIR

Citator

Cited By

• Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675 (U.S. 1988)
  …rmissible questioning. The coercive environment never dissipated.” App. to Pet. for Cert. 24. The Arizona Supreme Court denied a petition for review. Id., at 25. We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict with certain other state court decisions.3 484 U. S. 975 (1987). We now affirm. [*680] hH HH A major purpose of the Court’s opinion in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S., at 441-442, was “to give concrete constitutional guidelines for law enforcement agencies and courts to follow.” “As we have stressed on num…
• Mills v. Maryland, 486 U.S. 367 (U.S. 1988)
  …the existence of the circumstance, rather than a unanimous determination that the circumstance did not exist. Id., at 92-95, 527 A. 2d, at 32-33. Because of the importance of the issue in Maryland’s capital-punishment scheme, we granted certiorari. 484 U. S. 975 (1987). II Petitioner’s argument is straightforward, and well illustrated by a hypothetical situation he contends is possible under the Maryland capital sentencing scheme:5 “If eleven jurors agree that there are six mitigating circumstances, the…
• United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc., 487 U.S. 72 (U.S. 1988)
  …rict Court lacks even colorable jurisdiction, a standard not met here. We granted certiorari to resolve whether a nonparty witness may defend against a civil contempt adjudication by challenging the subject-matter jurisdiction of the district court. 484 U. S. 975 (1987). We hold the nonparty witness may raise such a claim, and now reverse. I In the underlying action, Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc., and others (ARM) sued to revoke the tax-exempt status of the Roman Catholic Church in the United States.…