MAALOUF ET AL.

v.

HADDAD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• Street v. J.C. Bradford & Co., 886 F.2d 1472 (6th Cir. 1989)
  …. 2d 1487 (11th Cir.1988); Donate-Romero v. Colorado, 856 F. 2d 384 (1st Cir.1988); Dowling v. City of Philadelphia, 855 F. 2d 136 (3d Cir. 1988); Valley Liquors, Inc. v. Renfield Importers, Ltd., 822 F. 2d 656, 659-60 n. 4 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 977, 108 S.Ct. 488, 98 L.Ed.2d 486 (1987); Slaughter v. Allstate Ins. Co., 803 F. 2d 857, 860 (5th Cir.1986); Burchett v. General Tel. Co. of the South, 699 F.Supp. 114, 116 (E.D.Ky.1988); Butler Foods, Inc. v. Trailer Marine Transp. Corp., 680 F.Supp.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Walter L. Reazin, M.D. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield OF Kan., Inc., 899 F.2d 951 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …2d 656, 667 (7th Cir.) (“Without a showing of special market conditions or other compelling evidence of market power, the lowest possible market share legally sufficient to sustain a finding of monopolization is between 17% and 25%.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 977, 108 S.Ct. 488, 98 L.Ed.2d 486 (1987), and Dimmitt Agri Indus., Inc. v. CPC Int'l, Inc., 679 F. 2d 516, 529 (5th Cir.1982) (“market shares in the range of 16 to 25 percent, such as those held by [defendant] are insufficient — at least absent other c…
• Jardien v. Winston Network, 888 F.2d 1151 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …als. . Winston also correctly asserts that a mistake or error in its judgment as to Jardien’s performance would be a sufficient justification for Jar-dien’s dismissal. See Pollard v. Rea Magnet Wire Co., 824 F. 2d 557, 559 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 977, 108 S.Ct. 488, 98 L.Ed.2d 486 (1987). Winston presented little, if any, evidence to support this theory. In any event, we find sufficient evidence in the record to indicate that Winston, acting through its employees, was not mistaken about Jardien’…