SOLOMON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Tobin, 923 F.2d 1506 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …ropriate inquiry is whether the facts ... would lead a reasonable, experienced agent to believe that evidence might be destroyed before a warrant could be secured.’ ” Id. (quoting United States v. Rivera, 825 F. 2d 152, 156 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 979, 108 S.Ct. 494, 98 L.Ed.2d 492 (1987)). [*1511] Prior to their approach to the house, the agents had probable cause to believe that narcotics were in the garage or the house and knew that at least two persons were in the house. They also knew that t…
• United States v. Hamblin, 911 F.2d 551 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …y the district court. Jones and Hamblin’s respective juries convicted them on the remaining counts in the indictment. DISCUSSION 1. Appellants’ Claims Under 18 U.S.C. § 9U(c) In United States v. Rawlings, 821 F. 2d 1543 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 979, 108 S.Ct. 494, 98 L.Ed.2d 492 (1987), we held that the enhanced penalty provision of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) applies to multiple offenses, even if those offenses are charged in a single indictment. That opinion briefly reviewed basic rules of statutory…
• United States v. Thornbrugh, 962 F.2d 1438 (10th Cir. 1992)